course topics, from R&D and clinical trials to manufacturing, global regulatory, and post-market concerns.
instruction from the best Subject Matter Experts in pharma, biotech, and med device.
content that provides you with practical solutions to the toughest challenges.
features for the adult learner including polling, break-outs, and assessments.
UPCOMING LIVE COURSES
101 INTRO LEVEL COURSES
View all 101 Level Courses.
STAY TUNED WITH US
Subscribe for the latest pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device training courses and special offers.
The U.K. has until March 29, 2019 to negotiate a deal with the EU to remain a member of the EMA. If no agreement is reached, MHRA has set forth the principles that will be in place on March 30 in case of a “no deal” scenario,including recently introduced new guidelines for the batch testing of medicines entering or leaving the U.K.
The question is no longer, “Will continuous manufacturing work?”, but “When will everyone be doing it?” But surprisingly, there are still many objections to continuous manufacturing within the biopharma industry.
The regenerative medicine sector is at a remarkable moment. Transformative products are now on the market and accessible to greater numbers of patients every day. Dozens of additional therapies are in late stage studies. The regulatory and policy environment has evolved rapidly alongside the science, enabling a surge of incoming innovation.
In July 2018, the FDA unveiled a Biosimilar Action Plan (BAP) intended to “facilitate the efficient development and approval” of biosimilar products. When FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb introduced the BAP, he emphasized the importance of building a market for biosimilar products and expressed concern that the market is not yet established.
With the 2018 Compounding Policy Priorities Plan, the FDA has established a clear pathway for advancement of policies for traditional compounding pharmacies and associated outsourcing facilities. The agency intends to implement the strategies while ensuring access to medications for the critical patient population. It is acting under the belief that a growing number of organizations are trying to get into the large drug manufacturers’ domain while operating under pharmacy licenses.
Thanks to our relationship with LSTI and an outstanding team here at Accelovance, we have built a training program that is able to be leveraged moving forward to address an industry need.
My main reason for taking the course was to re-evaluate quality agreements and how to improve our current template. Coming out of this, I would like to compare a few of our supplier quality agreements against the structure and checklist given in the course to see how they align.
Cook Pharmica LLC
All parts of the training were useful, including the topics of Documentation, Change Control and Revisions. I will now review our current Quality Agreement to make sure the requirements are included, and if not, add them.
I took the course to get a better understanding of FDA requirements. As an ISO 9001 registered organization, we need to control and cooperate with suppliers and this gave me some ideas on more formal ways to do that. The webinar was easy to attend with clear audio.