Do you like fighting quality fires? Do you enjoy generating meaningless metric reports that no one acts upon? Do you get the most from your quality risk management (QRM) program? This article provides three practical steps for integrating QRM into your quality system to ensure your organization stays on course.
Following the publication of ICH Q9, industry eagerly embraced the opportunity to share ideas and best practices related to QRM. The cadence of publication steadily increased as ICH Q8, ICH Q10, and ICH Q11 emerged, as thought leaders sought to provide practical guidance to industry on the application of QRM. This article will focus on selected publications addressing general, rather than specific, applications of QRM.
Quality risk management (QRM) is not a concept to be applied in a vacuum. Rather, it is a discipline that provides the most value when used throughout the product life cycle.
This is the second in a series of six articles intended to provide a holistic primer on the field of quality risk management (QRM). This installment reviews the origins of pharmaceutical risk management and regulatory thinking that led to the establishment of QRM as a unique discipline in pharmaceutical development and manufacturing.
This article marks the first of a series intended to provide a holistic primer on the field of quality risk management (QRM). The series will provide background information for those new to the QRM discipline and will explore topics including the various types of risks associated with medicinal products, the role of risk management in pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical regulation, QRM principles and practices, the role of QRM across the product life cycle, primary literature sources for QRM, and common challenges associated with QRM implementation.
To some extent, the Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline For Good Clinical Practice E6(R2) has come and gone without much fanfare. Perhaps that’s because prior guidance documents surrounding risk-based quality management practices stole its thunder, and sponsors, CROs, and investigators were already well on their way to finding ways to “encourage implementation of improved and more efficient approaches to clinical trial design, conduct, oversight, recording and reporting while continuing to ensure human subject protection and reliability of trial results,” as advocated by ICH E6 (R2).